Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
Section 23-66-510 - Insurer antifraud initiative — Arkansas Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Arkansas/
  4. Title 23 - Public Utilities and Regulated Industries (§§ 23-1-101 — 23-119-105)/
  5. Subtitle 3 - Insurance/
  6. Chapter 66 - Trade Practices Sub/
  7. Subchapter 5 - Frauduluent Insurance Acts Prevention/
  8. Section 23-66-510 - Insurer antifraud initiative
Arkansas Legal Code

Section 23-66-510 - Insurer antifraud initiative

(a) Insurers shall have antifraud initiatives reasonably calculated to detect, prosecute, and prevent fraudulent insurance acts. Antifraud initiatives may include, but are not limited to: (1) Fraud investigators, who may be insurer employees or independent contractors; or(2) An antifraud plan submitted to the Insurance Commissioner. Antifraud plans submitted to the commissioner shall be privileged and confidential and shall not be a public record and shall not be subject to discovery or subpoena in a civil or criminal action.(b) Upon the written request of an insurer, the commissioner may grant an exemption from the requirements of this section if the commissioner determines that such an exemption would not be detrimental to the interests of the public.Acts 1997, No. 217, § 1.

(a) Insurers shall have antifraud initiatives reasonably calculated to detect, prosecute, and prevent fraudulent insurance acts. Antifraud initiatives may include, but are not limited to: (1) Fraud investigators, who may be insurer employees or independent contractors; or(2) An antifraud plan submitted to the Insurance Commissioner. Antifraud plans submitted to the commissioner shall be privileged and confidential and shall not be a public record and shall not be subject to discovery or subpoena in a civil or criminal action.(b) Upon the written request of an insurer, the commissioner may grant an exemption from the requirements of this section if the commissioner determines that such an exemption would not be detrimental to the interests of the public.Acts 1997, No. 217, § 1.
Ask AI about this