Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
Section 27-37-703 - Effect of noncompliance — Arkansas Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Arkansas/
  4. Title 27 - Transportation (§§ 27-1-101 — 27-117-105)/
  5. Subtitle 3 - Motor Vehicles and Their Equipment/
  6. Chapter 37 - Equipment Regulations Sub/
  7. Subchapter 7 - Mandatory Seat Belt Use/
  8. Section 27-37-703 - Effect of noncompliance
Arkansas Legal Code

Section 27-37-703 - Effect of noncompliance

(a)(1) The failure of an occupant to wear a properly adjusted and fastened seat belt shall not be admissible into evidence in a civil action.(2) Provided, that evidence of the failure may be admitted in a civil action as to the causal relationship between noncompliance and the injuries alleged, if the following conditions have been satisfied:(A) The plaintiff has filed a products liability claim other than a claim related to an alleged failure of a seat belt;(B) The defendant alleging noncompliance with this subchapter shall raise this defense in its answer or timely amendment thereto in accordance with the rules of civil procedure; and(C) Each defendant seeking to offer evidence alleging noncompliance has the burden of proving: (i) Noncompliance;(ii) That compliance would have reduced injuries; and(iii) The extent of the reduction of the injuries.(b)(1) Upon request of any party, the trial judge shall hold a hearing out of the presence of the jury as to the admissibility of such evidence in accordance with the provisions of this section and the rules of evidence.(2) The finding of the trial judge shall not constitute a finding of fact, and the finding shall be limited to the

evidence in accordance with the provisions of this section and the rules of evidence.(2) The finding of the trial judge shall not constitute a finding of fact, and the finding shall be limited to the issue of admissibility of such evidence.Acts 1991, No. 562, § 5; 1993, No. 1086, § 1; 1995, No. 1118, § 1.

(a)(1) The failure of an occupant to wear a properly adjusted and fastened seat belt shall not be admissible into evidence in a civil action.(2) Provided, that evidence of the failure may be admitted in a civil action as to the causal relationship between noncompliance and the injuries alleged, if the following conditions have been satisfied:(A) The plaintiff has filed a products liability claim other than a claim related to an alleged failure of a seat belt;(B) The defendant alleging noncompliance with this subchapter shall raise this defense in its answer or timely amendment thereto in accordance with the rules of civil procedure; and(C) Each defendant seeking to offer evidence alleging noncompliance has the burden of proving: (i) Noncompliance;(ii) That compliance would have reduced injuries; and(iii) The extent of the reduction of the injuries.(b)(1) Upon request of any party, the trial judge shall hold a hearing out of the presence of the jury as to the admissibility of such evidence in accordance with the provisions of this section and the rules of evidence.(2) The finding of the trial judge shall not constitute a finding of fact, and the finding shall be limited to the

evidence in accordance with the provisions of this section and the rules of evidence.(2) The finding of the trial judge shall not constitute a finding of fact, and the finding shall be limited to the issue of admissibility of such evidence.Acts 1991, No. 562, § 5; 1993, No. 1086, § 1; 1995, No. 1118, § 1.
Ask AI about this