Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
§ 28-3-601 — District of Columbia Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. District of Columbia/
  4. Title 28 - Commercial Instruments and Transactions. [Enacted Title]/
  5. Subtitle I - Uniform Commercial Code/
  6. Article 3 - Negotiable Instruments/
  7. Part VI - Discharge and Payment§ 28:3–601. Discharge and Effect of Discharge/
  8. § 28-3-601
District of Columbia Legal Code

§ 28-3-601

Discharge and effect of discharge. (a) The obligation of a party to pay the instrument is discharged as stated in this article or by an act or agreement with the party which would discharge an obligation to pay money under a simple contract. (b) Discharge of the obligation of a party is not effective against a person acquiring rights of a holder in due course of the instrument without notice of the discharge. (Dec. 30, 1963, 77 Stat. 691, Pub. L. 88-243, § 1; Mar. 23, 1995, D.C. Law 10-249, § 2(d), 42 DCR 467.) Prior Codifications 1981 Ed., § 28:3-601. 1973 Ed., § 28:3-601. Uniform Commercial Code Comment Subsection (a) replaces subsections (1) and (2) of former Section 3-601. Subsection (b) restates former Section 3-602. Notice of discharge is not treated as notice of a defense that prevents holder in due course status. Section 3-302(b). Discharge is effective against a holder in due course only if the holder had notice of the discharge when holder in due course status was acquired. For example, if an instrument bearing a canceled indorsement is taken by a holder, the holder has notice that the indorser has been discharged.

ischarge when holder in due course status was acquired. For example, if an instrument bearing a canceled indorsement is taken by a holder, the holder has notice that the indorser has been discharged. Thus, the discharge is effective against the holder even if the holder is a holder in due course.
Ask AI about this