Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
§ 425.138 — Hawaii Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Hawaii/
  4. Title 23 - Corporations and Partnerships414. Hawaii Business Corporation Act414-1 Short Title/
  5. Chapter 425/
  6. § 425.138
Hawaii Legal Code

§ 425.138

Ask AI about this
§425-138 Events causing dissolution and winding up of partnership business. A partnership is dissolved, and its business shall be wound up, only upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) In a partnership at will, the partnership's having notice from a partner, other than a partner who is dissociated under section 425-130(2) to (10), of that partner's express will to withdraw as a partner, or on a later date specified by the partner; (2) In a partnership for a definite term or particular undertaking: (A) Within ninety days after a partner's dissociation by death or otherwise under section 425-130(6) to (10) or wrongful dissociation under section 425-131(b), the express will of at least half of the remaining partners to wind up the partnership business, for which purpose a partner's rightful dissociation pursuant to section 425-131(b)(2) constitutes the expression of that partner's will to wind up the partnership business; (B) The express will of all of the partners to wind up the partnership business; or (C) The expiration of the term or the completion of the undertaking; (3) An event agreed to in the partnership agreement resulting in the winding up of the

ers to wind up the partnership business; or (C) The expiration of the term or the completion of the undertaking; (3) An event agreed to in the partnership agreement resulting in the winding up of the partnership business; (4) An event that makes it unlawful for all or substantially all of the business of the partnership to be continued, but a cure of illegality within ninety days after notice to the partnership of the event is effective retroactively to the date of the event for purposes of this section; (5) On application by a partner, a judicial determination that: (A) The economic purpose of the partnership is likely to be unreasonably frustrated; (B) Another partner has engaged in conduct relating to the partnership business which makes it not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in partnership with that partner; or (C) It is not otherwise reasonably practicable to carry on the partnership business in conformity with the partnership agreement; or (6) On application by a transferee of a partner's transferable interest, a judicial determination that it is equitable to wind up the partnership business: (A) After the expiration of the term or completion of the

tion by a transferee of a partner's transferable interest, a judicial determination that it is equitable to wind up the partnership business: (A) After the expiration of the term or completion of the undertaking, if the partnership was for a definite term or particular undertaking at the time of the transfer or entry of the charging order that gave rise to the transfer; or (B) At any time, if the partnership was a partnership at will at the time of the transfer or entry of the charging order that gave rise to the transfer. [L 1999, c 284, pt of §1]