Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
§ 26-1-9-1-336 — Indiana Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Indiana/
  4. Title 26 - Commercial Law/
  5. Article 1 - Uniform Commercial Code/
  6. Chapter 9.1 - Secured Transactions26-1-9.1-101. Short Title/
  7. § 26-1-9-1-336
Indiana Legal Code

§ 26-1-9-1-336

Ask AI about this
(b) A security interest does not exist in commingled goods as such. However, a security interest may attach to a product or mass that results when goods become commingled goods.(c) If collateral becomes commingled goods, a security interest attaches to the product or mass.(d) If a security interest in collateral is perfected before the collateral becomes commingled goods, the security interest that attaches to the product or mass under subsection (c) is perfected.(e) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), the other provisions of IC 26-1-9.1-301 through IC 26-1-9.1-342 determine the priority of a security interest that attaches to the product or mass under subsection (c).(f) If more than one (1) security interest attaches to the product or mass under subsection (c), the following rules determine priority:(1) A security interest that is perfected under subsection (d) has priority over a security interest that is unperfected at the time the collateral becomes commingled goods.(2) If more than one

ority:(1) A security interest that is perfected under subsection (d) has priority over a security interest that is unperfected at the time the collateral becomes commingled goods.(2) If more than one (1) security interest is perfected under subsection (d), the security interests rank equally in proportion to value of the collateral at the time it became commingled goods.As added by P.L.57-2000, SEC.45.