CourtGPT is an AI-powered legal technology platform that provides attorney directory services, legal research tools, and intelligent legal assistance for individuals and law firms.

How can I find an attorney on CourtGPT?

You can search our comprehensive attorney directory by location, practice area, or attorney name. Our AI-powered search helps match you with the right legal professional for your needs.

Is CourtGPT free to use?

CourtGPT offers a free tier with access to attorney directory and basic legal research. Premium features are available for law firms and legal professionals.

What legal resources does CourtGPT provide?

CourtGPT provides access to state laws and regulations, attorney profiles, legal blog articles, AI-powered legal research assistance, and marketing tools for law firms.

How does CourtGPT help law firms?

CourtGPT helps law firms with attorney profile listings, lead generation, marketing solutions, and AI-powered tools to enhance their practice and reach more clients.

What AI features does CourtGPT offer?

CourtGPT offers AI-powered legal research, intelligent document analysis, case law search, statute interpretation, and automated legal content generation for law firms.

How much does CourtGPT cost?

CourtGPT offers a free plan for basic access, Professional plan at $499/month with advanced features, and Enterprise plan at $999/month for large law firms.

CourtGPT logo

RS 13:5523 - Sheriff's general fund; commissions from tax collections; disbursements from fund A. Repealed by Acts 1978, No. 339, §2, eff. June 30, 1978. B.(1) The tax collector shall deduct fifteen percent commission which he is to turn over to the sheriff's general fund from the following: all state taxes and licenses, except hunting and fishing licenses, and parish licenses collected by him and actually paid by him to the state and parish treasury or the authority designated by law to receive same. (2) In addition, the sheriff of the parish of Jefferson shall collect all sales taxes levied by the Jefferson Parish Council and/or the Jefferson Parish School Board, for which collection he shall receive as compensation, eleven percent of the aggregate amount of sales taxes collected by the sheriff and levied by the Jefferson Parish Council, and nine and one-half percent of the aggregate amount of sales taxes collected by the sheriff and levied by the Jefferson Parish School Board. (3)(a) The sheriff of the parish of St. Bernard shall collect all sales taxes levied in St. Bernard Parish for which collection he shall receive as compensation up to nine percent of the aggregate amount

a) The sheriff of the parish of St. Bernard shall collect all sales taxes levied in St. Bernard Parish for which collection he shall receive as compensation up to nine percent of the aggregate amount of sales taxes collected by the sheriff and levied by the St. Bernard Parish Police Jury or the St. Bernard Parish School Board, or both. NOTE: Subparagraph (B)(3)(b) was repealed by Acts 1992, No. 536, §2 upon expiration of certain taxes. See Acts 1992, No. 536, §2. (b) However, notwithstanding any other provision of this Paragraph to the contrary, any additional sales and use tax imposed by the St. Bernard Parish Police Jury or the St. Bernard Parish School Board subsequent to the effective date of this Subparagraph shall be collected by the sheriff without compensation for the collection of such additional sales and use tax. C. In the following parishes, the tax collector shall deduct as commissions not more than the following percentages of the aggregate amount of such taxes shown to be collectable by the tax rolls: (1) Acadia 15% (2) Allen 14 1/2% (3) Ascension 19% (4) Assumption 19% (5) Avoyelles 18% (6) Beauregard 13% (7) Bienville 14% (8) Bossier 9% (9) Caddo 7% (10) Calcasieu

e collectable by the tax rolls: (1) Acadia 15% (2) Allen 14 1/2% (3) Ascension 19% (4) Assumption 19% (5) Avoyelles 18% (6) Beauregard 13% (7) Bienville 14% (8) Bossier 9% (9) Caddo 7% (10) Calcasieu 10 1/2% (11) Caldwell 16% (12) Cameron 16% (13) Catahoula 14% (14) Claiborne 12% (15) Concordia 16% (16) DeSoto 15% (17) East Baton Rouge Parish 8 1/4% (18) East Carroll 14% (19) East Feliciana 22% (20) Evangeline 14% (21) Franklin 11% (22) Grant 15% (23) Iberia 14% (24) Iberville 20% (25) Jackson 14% (26) Jefferson 11% Provided, however, that the commission provided herein shall be 9 1/2% of the aggregate amount of taxes collected by the sheriff and levied by the Jefferson Parish School Board. (27) Jefferson Davis 11% (28) Lafayette 15% (29) Lafourche 13% (30) LaSalle 14% (31) Lincoln 10% (32) Livingston 17% (33) Madison 11% (34) Morehouse 11% (35) Natchitoches 12% (36) Ouachita 9 1/2% (37) Plaquemines 12% (38) Pointe Coupee 15% (39) Rapides 10% (40) Red River 20% (41) Richland 11% (42) Sabine 16% (43) St. Bernard 12% (44) St. Charles 14% (45) St. Helena 18% (46) St. James 15% (47) St. John the Baptist 20% Provided, however, that after June 30, 1980, the rate shall be 18%. (48) St.

Sabine 16% (43) St. Bernard 12% (44) St. Charles 14% (45) St. Helena 18% (46) St. James 15% (47) St. John the Baptist 20% Provided, however, that after June 30, 1980, the rate shall be 18%. (48) St. Landry 13% (49) St. Martin 14% (50) St. Mary 12% (51) St. Tammany 12% (52) Tangipahoa 15% (53) Tensas 13% (54) Terrebonne 11% (55) Union 11% (56) Vermilion 15% (57) Vernon 14% (58) Washington 14 1/2% (59) Webster 11 1/2% (60) West Baton Rouge 16% (61) West Carroll 12% (62) West Feliciana 20% (63) Winn 17% The three percent increase in the percentage of the commission for the tax collector for Avoyelles Parish shall be dedicated to increasing the salaries of the full time deputies. In the event House Bill Nos. 1285* or 1505 of this session does not become law the commission of the sheriff of East Baton Rouge Parish shall remain at seven and one-half percent. D.(1) The sheriff and ex officio tax collector shall draw his salary monthly on his own check or warrant and shall monthly issue to employees and deputies, checks or warrants for the amount due them, which shall be drawn against and paid out of the sheriff's general fund.

hly on his own check or warrant and shall monthly issue to employees and deputies, checks or warrants for the amount due them, which shall be drawn against and paid out of the sheriff's general fund. For claims within the allowance above fixed and to be charged to the allowance he shall issue his own checks or warrants which shall be drawn against and paid out of the sheriff's general fund. The special account representing the sheriff's general fund shall show the total receipts of the office of the sheriff and ex officio tax collector in civil and criminal matters and other fees, allowances, charges, and commissions; the disbursement to the sheriff and ex officio tax collector, including the salary and all other expenses of the office; and also including the reimbursement of actual expenses paid out as hereinafter allowed. (2) In any case where the sheriff can with reasonable certainty estimate what will be the amount of the sheriff's general fund, as herein provided, he may at his discretion anticipate not exceeding seventy-five percent of the same exclusive of interest according to the needs of his office and may negotiate his own warrants against the fund from month to month

discretion anticipate not exceeding seventy-five percent of the same exclusive of interest according to the needs of his office and may negotiate his own warrants against the fund from month to month or may execute notes or other evidences of indebtedness against the sheriff's general fund. In that case, the warrants or the notes or other evidences of indebtedness and the interest thereon shall be paid from the sheriff's general fund as the money accrues therein, and the general fund is pledged for the payment of such warrants or notes or other evidences of indebtedness executed under the authority of this Subsection. E. Repealed by Acts 1976, No. 689, §3. Amended by Acts 1950, No. 110, §1; Acts 1952, No. 217, §1; Acts 1954, No. 151, §1; Acts 1956, No. 343, §1; Acts 1958, No. 446, §1; Acts 1960, No. 241, §1; Acts 1961, No. 42, §1; Acts 1963, No. 50, §1; Acts 1964, No. 510; Acts 1964, Ex.Sess., No. 12, §1; Acts 1965, No. 68; Acts 1966, No. 220; Acts 1966, No. 268, §1; Acts 1967, No. 65, §1; Acts 1967, No. 70; Acts 1968, No. 444, §1; Acts 1969, No. 99, §1; Acts 1969, No. 100, §1; Acts 1969, No. 102, §1; Acts 1969, No. 107, §1; Acts 1969, No. 129, §1; Acts 1970, No.

Acts 1967, No. 65, §1; Acts 1967, No. 70; Acts 1968, No. 444, §1; Acts 1969, No. 99, §1; Acts 1969, No. 100, §1; Acts 1969, No. 102, §1; Acts 1969, No. 107, §1; Acts 1969, No. 129, §1; Acts 1970, No. 66, §1; Acts 1970, No. 70, §1; Acts 1970, No. 88, §1; Acts 1971, No. 122, §1; Acts 1971, No. 129, §1; Acts 1972, No. 44, §1; Acts 1972, No. 56, §1; Acts 1972, No. 75, §1; Acts 1972, No. 77, §1; Acts 1972, No. 283, §1; Acts 1972, No. 286; Acts 1972, No. 290; Acts 1972, No. 308, §1; Acts 1972, No. 313, §1; Acts 1972, No. 356, §1; Acts 1972, No. 357, §1; Acts 1972, No. 575, §1; Acts 1972, No. 587, §1; Acts 1972, No. 593, §1; Acts 1972, No. 618; Acts 1973, No. 192; Acts 1974, No. 319, §1; Acts 1974, No. 392, §1; Acts 1975, No. 173, §1; Acts 1976, No. 186, §1; Acts 1976, No. 421, §1; Acts 1976, No. 452, §1; Acts 1976, No. 566, §1; Acts 1976, No. 570, §1; Acts 1976, No. 602, §1; Acts 1976, No. 689, §2, 3; Acts 1977, No. 591, §1; Acts 1984, No. 261, §1, eff. June 30, 1984; Acts 1985, No. 881, §1, eff. Oct. 1, 1985; Acts 1986, No. 1066, §1; Acts 1992, No. 536, §§1 and 2; Acts 1998, 1st Ex. Sess., No. 164, §1, eff. Sept. 21, 1998; Acts 2000, 2d Ex. Sess., No. 1, §1, eff.

Acts 1985, No. 881, §1, eff. Oct. 1, 1985; Acts 1986, No. 1066, §1; Acts 1992, No. 536, §§1 and 2; Acts 1998, 1st Ex. Sess., No. 164, §1, eff. Sept. 21, 1998; Acts 2000, 2d Ex. Sess., No. 1, §1, eff. June 26, 2000; Redesignated from R.S. 33:1423 pursuant to Acts 2011, No. 248, §3. {{NOTE: SEE ACTS 1992, NO. 536, §2.}} NOTE: SEE ACTS 1998, 1ST EX. SESS., NO 164, §4, RE: EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF ACT. LETTER DATED SEPT. 21, 1998, WAS SENT TO DEPT. OF WILDLIFE & FISHERIES FROM COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION STATING THAT FUNDS WERE APPROPRIATED FROM THE LA. TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION FUND TO IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM. *Acts 1976, No. 689.