Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
§ 504b-175 — Minnesota Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Minnesota/
  4. Chapters 500 515b/
  5. Chapter 504b - — Landlord and Tenant/
  6. § 504b-175
Minnesota Legal Code

§ 504b-175

Ask AI about this
504B.175 PRELEASE DEPOSIT. Subdivision 1. Definition. For the purpose of this section, 'prelease deposit' means payment given to a landlord from a prospective tenant of a residential dwelling unit before the prospective tenant and the landlord have entered into a rental agreement. 'Prelease deposit' does not include the payment of a reasonable applicant screening fee used to conduct a background check on the prospective tenant. Subd. 2. Limitations. (a) A prelease deposit may be accepted only if the landlord and prospective tenant enter into a conspicuous written agreement that includes: (1) the circumstances under which it will be returned; and (2) that the landlord is required to return the prelease deposit within seven days of the occurrence of a circumstance described in clause (1). (b) 'Return' means postmarked within seven days except that upon the prospective tenant's request, a landlord may destroy the payment or hold it for retrieval by the tenant instead of returning it by mail. Subd. 3. Application on entry into rental agreement. If a prospective tenant and landlord do enter into a rental agreement, the prelease deposit must be applied to that tenant's security deposit

ail. Subd. 3. Application on entry into rental agreement. If a prospective tenant and landlord do enter into a rental agreement, the prelease deposit must be applied to that tenant's security deposit or rent. Subd. 4. Remedies. In addition to any other remedies, a landlord who violates this section is liable to the payor of the prelease deposit for the amount of the deposit paid, plus one-half of that amount as a penalty. A landlord who enters into a rental agreement with a tenant is not liable under this section unless the landlord failed to comply with subdivision 3. History: 1999 c 97 s 1; 1999 c 199 art 1 s 174