Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
§ 626a-32 — Minnesota Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Minnesota/
  4. Chapters 625 634/
  5. Chapter 626a - — Wire, Electronic, or Oral Communications; Interception/
  6. § 626a-32
Minnesota Legal Code

§ 626a-32

Ask AI about this
626A.32 CIVIL ACTION. Subdivision 1. Cause of action. Except as provided in section 626A.28, subdivision 5, a provider of electronic communication service, subscriber, or customer aggrieved by a violation of this chapter in which the conduct constituting the violation is engaged in with a knowing or intentional state of mind may, in a civil action, recover from the person or entity which engaged in that violation relief as may be appropriate. Subd. 2. Relief. In a civil action under this section, appropriate relief includes: (1) temporary and other equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate; (2) damages under subdivision 3; and (3) a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. Subd. 3. Damages. The court may assess as damages in a civil action under this section the sum of the actual damages suffered by the plaintiff and any profits made by the violator as a result of the violation, but in no case is a person entitled to recover to receive less than the sum of $1,000. Subd. 4. Defense. A good faith reliance on: (1) a court warrant or order, a grand jury subpoena, a legislative authorization, or a statutory authorization; or (2) a good faith

than the sum of $1,000. Subd. 4. Defense. A good faith reliance on: (1) a court warrant or order, a grand jury subpoena, a legislative authorization, or a statutory authorization; or (2) a good faith determination that section 626A.02, subdivision 3, permitted the conduct complained of; is a complete defense to a civil or criminal action brought under sections 626A.26 to 626A.34 or any other law. Subd. 5. Limitation. A civil action under this section may not be commenced later than two years after the date upon which the claimant first discovered or had a reasonable opportunity to discover the violation. History: 1988 c 577 s 53,62; 1989 c 336 art 2 s 8