Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
Statute 24 313 — Nebraska Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Nebraska/
  4. Chapter 24 - Courts24-5,100 - Transferred to/
  5. Article 3/
  6. Statute 24 313
Nebraska Legal Code

Statute 24 313

Ask AI about this
24-313. Inferior tribunal; powers over.The district court may by rule compel an inferior court or board to allow an appeal or to make or amend records according to law either by correcting an evident mistake or supplying an evident omission. This section shall not apply if the Administrative Procedure Act otherwise provides.Source Laws 1879, § 28, p. 88; R.S.1913, § 1172; C.S.1922, § 1095; C.S.1929, § 27-313; R.S.1943, § 24-313; Laws 1988, LB 352, § 23; Laws 1989, LB 182, § 7; Laws 2010, LB800, § 1. Cross References Administrative Procedure Act, see section 84-920.Annotations District court may by order compel an inferior court or tribunal to amend record to correct an evident mistake. Liljehorn v. Fyfe, 178 Neb. 532, 134 N.W.2d 230 (1965). District court may, by order, direct transcript to be returned to county judge for proper certification. Goetz Brewing Co. v. Waln, 92 Neb. 614, 139 N.W. 230 (1912), Ann. Cas. 1914A 336 (1912). District court may not compel excise board to reconvene and hear evidence excluded. In re Thompsen, 84 Neb. 67, 120 N.W. 952 (1909). Question of power to require supplemental transcript on criminal appeal raised but not decided. Thomsen v. State, 82 Neb.

and hear evidence excluded. In re Thompsen, 84 Neb. 67, 120 N.W. 952 (1909). Question of power to require supplemental transcript on criminal appeal raised but not decided. Thomsen v. State, 82 Neb. 634, 118 N.W. 330 (1908). District court may compel excise board to furnish certified transcript in appeal, in liquor license contest. State ex rel. Thomas v. Board of Fire & Police Comrs. of Omaha, 76 Neb. 741, 108 N.W. 122 (1906). District court may, by rule, compel county judge to write true history of case. New Home Sewing-Machine Co. v. Thornburg, 56 Neb. 636, 77 N.W. 86 (1898).