Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
Statute 25 1119 — Nebraska Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Nebraska/
  4. Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure25-10,100 - Failure to Furnish Bond; Duty and Liability of Officer; Return of Property to Defendant/
  5. Article 11/
  6. Statute 25 1119
Nebraska Legal Code

Statute 25 1119

Ask AI about this
25-1119. Assessment of amount of recovery.When, by the verdict, either party is entitled to recover money of the adverse party, the jury in their verdict must assess the amount of recovery.Source R.S.1867, Code § 295, p. 443; R.S.1913, § 7858; C.S.1922, § 8802; C.S.1929, § 20-1119; R.S.1943, § 25-1119. Annotations Verdict for the plaintiff in amount of 'no money' is in effect no verdict at all. Bushey v. French, 171 Neb. 809, 108 N.W.2d 237 (1961). Where jury finds for plaintiff on its cause of action, and also for defendant on its counterclaim or setoff, verdict must show amount of each finding. Horse Shoe Lake Drainage Dist. v. Crane Co., 112 Neb. 323, 199 N.W. 526 (1924). Court cannot disregard verdict and enter such judgment as evidence warrants; if verdict is not sustained by evidence, remedy is by motion for new trial. Kenesaw Mill & E. Co. v. Aufdenkamp, 106 Neb. 246, 183 N.W. 294 (1921). Court may in action of debt add interest when such appears from verdict to be so intended by jury. Wiruth v. Lashmett, 85 Neb. 286, 123 N.W. 427 (1909). Verdict may assess different amounts against different defendants. Lininger & Metcalf Co. v. Webb, 51 Neb. 10, 70 N.W. 519 (1897).

ended by jury. Wiruth v. Lashmett, 85 Neb. 286, 123 N.W. 427 (1909). Verdict may assess different amounts against different defendants. Lininger & Metcalf Co. v. Webb, 51 Neb. 10, 70 N.W. 519 (1897). Failure to include in judgment interest allowed by jury on verdict was not prejudicial to defendant. Wiseman v. Ziegler, 41 Neb. 886, 60 N.W. 320 (1894).