Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
Statute 104a 4208 — Nevada Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Nevada/
  4. Chapter 104a - Uniform Commercial Code—additional Articlesnrs 104a.010 - Applicability of and References to Uniform Commercial Code/
  5. Statute 104a 4208
Nevada Legal Code

Statute 104a 4208

Ask AI about this
1. If a payment order identifies an intermediary bank or the beneficiary’s bank only by an identifying number, the following rules apply: (a) The receiving bank may rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary’s bank and need not determine whether the number identifies a bank. (b) The sender is obliged to compensate the receiving bank for any loss and expenses incurred by the receiving bank as a result of its reliance on the number in executing or attempting to execute the order. 2. If a payment order identifies an intermediary bank or the beneficiary’s bank both by name and an identifying number and the name and number identify different persons, the following rules apply: (a) If the sender is a bank, the receiving bank may rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary’s bank if the receiving bank, when it executes the sender’s order, does not know that the name and number identify different persons. The receiving bank need not determine whether the name and number refer to the same person or whether the number refers to a bank.

, does not know that the name and number identify different persons. The receiving bank need not determine whether the name and number refer to the same person or whether the number refers to a bank. The sender is obliged to compensate the receiving bank for any loss and expenses incurred by the receiving bank as a result of its reliance on the number in executing or attempting to execute the order. (b) If the sender is not a bank and the receiving bank proves that the sender, before the payment order was accepted, had notice that the receiving bank might rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary’s bank even if it identifies a person different from the bank identified by name, the rights and obligations of the sender and the receiving bank are governed by paragraph (a), as though the sender were a bank. Proof of notice may be made by any admissible evidence. The receiving bank satisfies the burden of proof if it proves that the sender, before the payment order was accepted, signed a record stating the information to which the notice relates. (c) Whether or not the sender is a bank, the receiving bank may rely on the name as the proper

ore the payment order was accepted, signed a record stating the information to which the notice relates. (c) Whether or not the sender is a bank, the receiving bank may rely on the name as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary’s bank if the receiving bank, at the time it executes the sender’s order, does not know that the name and number identify different persons. The receiving bank need not determine whether the name and number refer to the same person. (d) If the receiving bank knows that the name and number identify different persons, reliance on either the name or the number in executing the sender’s payment order is a breach of the obligation stated in paragraph (a) of subsection 1 of NRS 104A.4302. (Added to NRS by 1991, 436; A 2023, 3247)