Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
Section 57-16-4 - Unlawful acts; dealers — New Mexico Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. New Mexico/
  4. Chapter 57 - Trade Practices and Regulations/
  5. Article 16 - Motor Vehicle Dealers Franchising/
  6. Section 57-16-4 - Unlawful acts; dealers
New Mexico Legal Code

Section 57-16-4 - Unlawful acts; dealers

Ask AI about this
It is unlawful for any dealer to: A. require a retail purchaser of a new motor vehicle, as a condition of sale and delivery thereof, to purchase special features, equipment, parts or accessories not ordered or desired by the purchaser, provided such features, equipment, parts or accessories are not already installed on the new motor vehicle when received by the dealer; B. use false, deceptive or misleading advertising in connection with his business; C. willfully defraud any retail buyer to the buyer's damage; D. fail to perform the obligations placed on the dealer in connection with the delivery and preparation of a new motor vehicle for retail sale as provided in the manufacturer's preparation and delivery agreements; E. fail to perform the obligations placed on the dealer in connection with the manufacturer's warranty agreements; F. represent or sell as a new motor vehicle any motor vehicle which has been used and operated for demonstration purposes or which is otherwise a used motor vehicle; or G. intentionally fail to perform any written agreement with any retail buyer. History: 1953 Comp., § 64-37-4, enacted by Laws 1973, ch. 6, § 4; 1985, ch. 236, § 1.

otherwise a used motor vehicle; or G. intentionally fail to perform any written agreement with any retail buyer. History: 1953 Comp., § 64-37-4, enacted by Laws 1973, ch. 6, § 4; 1985, ch. 236, § 1. ANNOTATIONSCross references. — For misrepresentation of age or condition of vehicle as an unlawful practice, see 57-12-6 NMSA 1978. Adequate statement of claim. — Allegations sufficient to state a claim under the New Mexico Motor Vehicle Dealers Franchising Act where car dealer affirmatively misrepresented to her that the car was a demonstrator, failed to disclose to that the car had been used as a rental car and had been involved in an accident. Salmeron v. Highlands Ford Sales, Inc., 271 F. Supp. 2d 1314 (D.N.M. 2003). Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Regulation or licensing of business of selling motor vehicles, 57 A.L.R.2d 1265, 7 A.L.R.3d 1173.