Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
Rule 67 — Puerto Rico Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Puerto Rico/
  4. Title Thirty Two Appendix/
  5. Appendix IV - Rules of Evidence for the General Court of Justice, 1979/
  6. Chapter VIII - Hearsayrule 60 - Definitions/
  7. Rule 67
Puerto Rico Legal Code

Rule 67

Ask AI about this
When a hearsay statement, as defined in this chapter, has been admitted in evidence, the credibility of the declarant may be attacked, and if attacked, may be supported by any evidence which would be admissible for those purposes if the declarant had testified as a witness. Evidence of a statement or conduct by a declarant-at any time-inconsistent with his hearsay statement, is not subject to any requirement of previous confrontation, so as to give the declarant an opportunity to deny or explain such statement or inconsistent conduct. If the party against whom a hearsay statement has been admitted calls the declarant as a witness, the party is entitled to examine him on the statement as if under cross-examination.