Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
Section 37-36-4 - Factors for claim of patent infringement not made in bad faith — South Dakota Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. South Dakota/
  4. Title 37 - Trade Regulation/
  5. Chapter 36 - Bad Faith Assertion of Patent Infringement/
  6. Section 37-36-4 - Factors for claim of patent infringement not made in bad faith
South Dakota Legal Code

Section 37-36-4 - Factors for claim of patent infringement not made in bad faith

Ask AI about this
37-36-4. Factors for claim of patent infringement not made in bad faith.A court may consider the following factors as evidence that a person has not made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement:(1)The demand letter contains all of the information described in subdivision 37-36-3(1);(2)If the demand letter lacks the information described in subdivision 37-36-3(1) and the target requests the information, the person provides the information within a reasonable period of time;(3)The person engages in a good faith effort to establish that the target has infringed the patent and to negotiate an appropriate remedy;(4)The person makes a substantial investment in the use of the patent or in the production or sale of a product or item covered by the patent;(5)The person is:(a)The inventor or joint inventor of the patent or, in the case of a patent filed by and awarded to an assignee of the original inventor or joint inventor, is the original assignee; or(b)An institution of higher education or a technology transfer organization owned or affiliated with an institution of higher education;(6)The person has:(a)Demonstrated good faith business practices in previous efforts to enforce the

on or a technology transfer organization owned or affiliated with an institution of higher education;(6)The person has:(a)Demonstrated good faith business practices in previous efforts to enforce the patent, or a substantially similar patent; or(b)Successfully enforced the patent, or a substantially similar patent, through litigation;(7)Any other factor the court finds relevant. Source: SL 2014, ch 192, §4.