§ 58-17d-2

58-17D-2. Certain utilization review organizations exempt from managed health care provisions.A utilization review organization that conducts utilization reviews solely for property and casualty insurers in this state pursuant to policies issued in this state is not subject to chapters 58-17F, 58-17G, 58-17H, and 58-17I except that any such utilization review organization shall register in the same manner as prescribed for utilization review organizations pursuant to §§58-17H-35 to 58-17H-39, inclusive. (SL 2012, ch 239, §1 provides: 'The provisions of chapter 219 of the 2011 Session Laws shall be deemed repealed if the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029 (2010) is found to be unconstitutional in its entirety by a final decision of a federal court of competent jurisdiction and all appeals exhausted or time for appeals elapsed.') Source: SL 2002, ch 231, §2; SL 2011, ch 219, §97. Commission Note: SL 2012, ch 239, §1 provides: 'The provisions of chapter 219 of the 2011 Session Laws shall be deemed repealed if the Patient

ed.') Source: SL 2002, ch 231, §2; SL 2011, ch 219, §97. Commission Note: SL 2012, ch 239, §1 provides: 'The provisions of chapter 219 of the 2011 Session Laws shall be deemed repealed if the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029 (2010) is found to be unconstitutional in its entirety by a final decision of a federal court of competent jurisdiction and all appeals exhausted or time for appeals elapsed.'