Skip to main content
CourtGPT logoCourtGPT
Directory
Law
For Attorneys
Blog
AppointmentsSign InSign Up
Section 27-1-124 - Stay of execution - Bond required in civil matters — Tennessee Law | CourtGPT
  1. Home/
  2. Laws/
  3. Tennessee/
  4. Title 27 - Appeal and Review/
  5. Chapter 1 - General Provisions (§§ 27-1-101 — 27-1-125)/
  6. Section 27-1-124 - Stay of execution - Bond required in civil matters
Tennessee Legal Code

Section 27-1-124 - Stay of execution - Bond required in civil matters

Ask AI about this
(a) If a plaintiff in a civil action obtains a judgment under any legal theory, the amount of the appeal bond necessary to stay execution during the course of all appeals or discretionary reviews of that judgment by any appellate court shall not exceed the lesser of twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000) or one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the judgment amount.(b) For purposes of determining the amount of the required bond, the court shall not include punitive or exemplary damages in the judgment amount.(c) Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b), if a party proves by a preponderance of the evidence that an appellant is dissipating assets outside the ordinary course of business to avoid payment of a judgment, a court may enter orders that are necessary to protect the appellee and establish the bond amount, which may include any punitive or exemplary damages.(d) If the appellant establishes by clear and convincing evidence at a post judgment hearing that the cost of the bond and the obligation resulting from the surety's payment of the bond in an amount authorized by this section will render the appellant insolvent, the court shall establish a security in an amount, and

and the obligation resulting from the surety's payment of the bond in an amount authorized by this section will render the appellant insolvent, the court shall establish a security in an amount, and other terms and conditions it deems proper, that would allow the appeal of the judgment to proceed, without resulting in the appellant's insolvency. This subsection (d) should be narrowly construed.(e) If this section is found to be in conflict with any rules prescribed by the supreme court, this section shall apply notwithstanding § 16-3-406. Acts 2003, ch. 276, § 1; 2011, ch. 510, § 7.