§ 14.30

Grounds for judicial dissolution (a) The Superior Court may dissolve a corporation:(1) in a proceeding by the Attorney General if it is established that:(A) the corporation obtained its articles of incorporation through fraud;(B) the corporation has continued to exceed or abuse the authority conferred upon it by law; (C) the corporation is a public benefit corporation and the corporate assets are being misapplied or wasted; or (D) the corporation is a public benefit corporation and is no longer able to carry out its purposes; (2) in a proceeding by 50 members or members holding five percent of the voting power, whichever is less, or by a director or any person specified in the articles, if it is established that: (A) the directors are deadlocked in the management of the corporate affairs, and the members, if any, are unable to breach the deadlock; (B) the directors or those in control of the corporation have acted, are acting or will act in a manner that is illegal, oppressive, or fraudulent; (C) the members are deadlocked in voting power and have failed, for a period that includes at least two consecutive annual meeting dates, to elect successors to directors whose terms

, or fraudulent; (C) the members are deadlocked in voting power and have failed, for a period that includes at least two consecutive annual meeting dates, to elect successors to directors whose terms have, or would otherwise have, expired; (D) the corporate assets are being misapplied or wasted; or(E) the corporation is a public benefit corporation and is no longer able to carry out its purposes; (3) in a proceeding by a creditor if it is established that:(A) the creditor’s claim has been reduced to judgment, the execution on the judgment returned unsatisfied and the corporation is insolvent; or (B) the corporation has admitted in writing that the creditor’s claim is due and owing and the corporation is insolvent; or (4) in a proceeding by the corporation to have its voluntary dissolution continued under court supervision. (b) Prior to dissolving a corporation, the court shall consider whether:(1) there are reasonable alternatives to dissolution;(2) dissolution is in the public interest, if the corporation is a public benefit corporation;(3) dissolution is the best way of protecting the interests of members, if the corporation is a mutual benefit corporation. (Added 1995, No.

terest, if the corporation is a public benefit corporation;(3) dissolution is the best way of protecting the interests of members, if the corporation is a mutual benefit corporation. (Added 1995, No. 179 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1997.)