§ 1565

(b) A putative holder may establish by a preponderance of the evidence that there is no unpaid debt or undischarged obligation for a debt or obligation described in subsection (a) of this section or that the debt or obligation was not, or no longer is, a fixed and certain obligation of the putative holder. (c) A putative holder may overcome prima facie evidence under subsection (a) of this section by establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that a check, draft, or similar instrument was: (1) issued as an unaccepted offer in settlement of an unliquidated amount;(2) issued but later was replaced with another instrument because the earlier instrument was lost or contained an error that was corrected; (3) issued to a party affiliated with the issuer;(4) paid, satisfied, or discharged;(5) issued in error;(6) issued without consideration;(7) issued but there was a failure of consideration;(8) voided not later than 90 days after issuance for a valid business reason set forth in a

ed;(5) issued in error;(6) issued without consideration;(7) issued but there was a failure of consideration;(8) voided not later than 90 days after issuance for a valid business reason set forth in a contemporaneous record; or (9) issued but not delivered to the third-party payee for a sufficient reason recorded within a reasonable time after issuance. (d) In asserting a defense under this section, a putative holder may present evidence of a course of dealing between the putative holder and the apparent owner or of custom and practice. (Added 2019, No. 93 (Adj. Sess.), § 2, eff. Jan. 1, 2021.)