RCW 26.18.120Wage assignment order—Employer's answer—Form.The answer of the employer shall be made on forms, served on the employer with the wage assignment order, substantially as follows:IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THESTATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THECOUNTY OF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .No. . . . . . . . . . . . .Obligee vs.ANSWER . . . . . . . . . . . .TO WAGEObligorASSIGNMENT ORDER . . . . . . . . . . . . Employer 1. At the time of the service of the wage assignment order on the employer, was the above-named obligor employed by or receiving earnings or other remuneration for employment from the employer?Yes . . . . . . No . . . . . . (check one).2. Are there any other attachments for child support or maintenance currently in effect against the obligor?Yes . . . . . . No . . . . . . (check one).3. If the answer to question one is yes and the employer cannot comply with the wage assignment order, provide an explanation: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.. . . .. . . .Signature of employerDate and place . . . .. . . .. . . explanation: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.. . . .. . . .Signature of employerDate and place . . . .. . . .. . . .Signature of personAddress for future noticeanswering for employerto employer. . . . Connection with employer[ 2008 c 6 s 1035; 1993 c 426 s 10; 1984 c 260 s 12.]NOTES:Part headings not law—Severability—2008 c 6: See RCW 26.60.900 and 26.60.901.
Washington Legal Code